Ohio and Tennessee Clash Over Nuclear Dominance

The race to become a leader in nuclear energy is heating up between Ohio and Tennessee, sparking concerns about the safety, environmental impact, and long-term consequences of nuclear expansion.

In a move that has alarmed many environmental activists, the Tennessee General Assembly recently added $10 million to Governor Bill Lee's nuclear fund, bringing its total to $60 million. This funding is aimed at supporting nuclear development, despite the well-documented risks associated with nuclear energy. The Tennessee Nuclear Energy Advisory Council, established by Governor Lee, has been pushing for more incentives to attract nuclear companies and create a Joint Office of Nuclear Advancement.

Critics argue that the push for new nuclear projects, such as the potential deployment of a Small Modular Reactor (SMR) at the Clinch River Nuclear Site, overlooks the potential dangers and high costs associated with nuclear energy. They point out that while nuclear power is often touted as a carbon-free energy source, it comes with significant risks, including radioactive waste, potential for catastrophic accidents, and long-term environmental contamination.

Meanwhile, Ohio is also making controversial moves in the nuclear arena. OKLO, a nuclear startup founded by OpenAI’s Sam Altman, plans to build two experimental reactors in Piketon, Ohio. This has raised eyebrows among local residents and environmental groups, who are concerned about the safety and environmental impact of these reactors. Furthermore, Centrus Energy is pushing forward with commercial uranium enrichment at Piketon, the only facility in the nation licensed to produce High-Assay Low-Enriched Uranium (HALEU), despite the contentious nature of this project.

The Ohio Nuclear Development Authority, which has faced its share of controversy, is aggressively seeking to attract more nuclear business to the Buckeye State. This move has been met with skepticism and opposition from those who fear the long-term implications of increasing the state's reliance on nuclear energy.

As Ohio and Tennessee vie for dominance in the nuclear industry, many are left questioning whether the potential benefits outweigh the significant risks. The debate over nuclear energy's future in these states continues to be a contentious and polarizing issue.